The Grand Foundational Introduction By: Ontological Thinker and Researcher, Dr. Fadi Sido
Today, I declare it plainly and without equivocation from the heart of Bonn, the former federal capital: the contemporary German political and social model has nearly reached the point of announcing its structural and moral bankruptcy. The acute political polarization that the country is experiencing this year, and the growing rise of far-right forces along with their persistent attempts to seize power, are nothing but the most prominent ontological symptom of the collapse of a false consciousness that concealed itself for decades behind the masks of procedural, technocratic, consensual rationality. This is something we can clearly perceive in the current partisan and electoral confusion witnessed on the German street.
German bureaucracy, with its rigid laws and bloated procedures disguised as logic and order, has transformed the public sphere into a vast prison of existential alienation. They claim rationality, yet they produce the pinnacle of irrationality when the human being and human freedom are reduced to data records, or when the individual is treated as a consumption statistic or a production tool subject to the complex conditions of the traditional market. This is the true crisis that the current welfare state has failed to contain, after its safety nets were transformed into instruments for suppressing crises rather than liberating the human being. My fieldwork in politics within the German Green Party since 2018 has revealed to me firsthand how environmental rationality was domesticated and converted from a liberating existential project — one that defends dignity and nature — into a part of a cold technocracy governed by material algorithms and imposed upon citizens as suffocating procedural and fiscal burdens, further deepening their estrangement from the street and the state.
The Bonn School of Critical Ontology comes today to establish an epistemological break with previous theories — including the output of the Frankfurt School, which confined itself to diagnosis and instrumental critique without offering a material and constructive alternative — and to announce its grand thesis: Ontological Solidarity. We are founding a new concept of human existence in which dignity and comprehensive material and psychological security constitute a primary, pre-existing ontological condition that cannot be encroached upon, and a fixed ontological constant that compels capital to orbit around the human being, and not the other way around. Democratic freedom does not flourish in an environment of stifling existential anxiety and fear of market fluctuations, and genuine political stability will not be achieved through the dry bureaucratic reform packages offered by centrist and conservative parties — packages that have empirically demonstrated their failure to present any inspiring future project. Rather, it will be achieved through the adoption of the concept of dynamic quasi-stable equilibrium: a flexible political system that is nourished by pluralism and continuous critique, and that is structurally fortified against extremism and collapse, because its ontological solidarity foundation is solid and philosophically and constitutionally protected. This system wrests fear and anxiety from the heart of the citizen and reformulates the social contract on living ethical foundations, with which our philosophical and political movement competes against the greatest contemporary intellectual and universal schools of thought.
سيريوس ميديا
الباحث الدكتور فادي سيدو
